Why Leading Banks and Mobile Money Operators Are Building on Stablecoin Rails in 2025
Insights
Back to blog
Peculiar Ibeabuchi
2025-11-24
Insights
On this page
The Regulatory Clarity Institutions Have Been Waiting For
The Business Case: Speed, Cost, and Competitive Pressure
The Competitive Reality: Build, Buy, or Get Left Behind
The Strategic Opportunity: New Revenue Streams at Lower Risk
What This Means for Your Institution
The institutional payment landscape is undergoing its most significant transformation in decades. In 2025, banks, mobile money operators, and payment service providers across emerging markets are no longer asking if they should integrate stablecoin infrastructure—they're asking how fast they can deploy it.
The numbers tell a compelling story: stablecoin transaction volumes reached $27.6 trillion in 2024, according to Visa's analysis, representing a 50% year-over-year increase. More tellingly, institutional adoption is accelerating at an unprecedented pace, with Circle reporting that 80% of USDC volume now comes from institutional payments rather than speculative trading.
The Regulatory Clarity Institutions Have Been Waiting For
For years, regulatory uncertainty kept traditional financial institutions on the sidelines. That's changed dramatically. The European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, fully implemented in December 2024, established the world's first comprehensive framework for stablecoin issuance and custody.
This regulatory milestone has triggered a domino effect across emerging markets. The UAE's Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (VARA) has licensed multiple stablecoin service providers, while Nigeria's Securities and Exchange Commission established clear rules for digital asset offerings in 2024. Kenya's Capital Markets Authority is following suit with its Digital Assets and Virtual Currencies Bill.
When institutions see clear regulatory frameworks, they move fast. The infrastructure question shifts from "Is this allowed?" to "Who can help us deploy this securely and compliantly?"
The Business Case: Speed, Cost, and Competitive Pressure
Traditional correspondent banking infrastructure is expensive and slow. The World Bank's Remittance Prices Worldwide database shows that the global average cost of sending $200 across borders remains at 6.35% as of Q4 2024—far above the UN's Sustainable Development Goal target of 3%.
Settlement times present another challenge. Cross-border payments through correspondent banking networks typically take 2-3 business days, with funds trapped in nostro and vostro accounts. A 2024 survey by Deloitte found that financial institutions hold over $5 trillion in correspondent banking accounts globally—capital that generates minimal returns while creating significant operational complexity.
Stablecoin rails offer a fundamentally different model: 24/7 settlement, near-instant finality, and transaction costs measured in basis points rather than percentage points. For mobile money operators handling millions of small-value transactions daily, this efficiency gain translates directly to bottom-line impact.
The Competitive Reality: Build, Buy, or Get Left Behind
The competitive landscape is forcing institutional hands. Payment giants are moving aggressively: Visa processed over $3.8 billion in stablecoin settlement volume in 2024, while Mastercard announced partnerships with multiple stablecoin issuers for its Multi-Token Network.
More concerning for traditional institutions: nimble FinTech competitors are already capturing market share. Companies like Chipper Cash and Wave are processing billions in cross-border payments using digital asset rails, offering customers speed and pricing that legacy infrastructure simply cannot match.
The "build vs. partner" calculus heavily favors partnership. Building compliant stablecoin infrastructure in-house requires blockchain expertise, custody solutions, regulatory licenses across multiple jurisdictions, and 24/7 operational capabilities—an 18-24 month timeline and eight-figure investment for most institutions.
Licensed infrastructure partners offer an alternative: modular, API-based solutions that integrate with existing core banking systems, enabling institutions to launch stablecoin-powered products in 6-12 weeks rather than 18+ months.
The Strategic Opportunity: New Revenue Streams at Lower Risk
Forward-thinking banks and mobile money operators aren't just using stablecoins to reduce costs—they're launching entirely new revenue-generating services:
- Cross-border remittances with same-day settlement at 70-80% lower cost than traditional rails
- B2B payment services enabling instant international supplier payments
- Treasury optimization for corporate clients seeking yield on operational balances
- Stablecoin-backed lending products with reduced counterparty risk
The institutions moving first are building competitive moats. In markets where customers have experienced instant, low-cost digital payments domestically, they increasingly expect the same cross-border. Institutions that can't deliver risk customer attrition to those who can.
What This Means for Your Institution
The stablecoin infrastructure decision is no longer experimental—it's strategic. The question isn't whether your institution will integrate stablecoin rails, but whether you'll be an early mover capturing market share or a late adopter playing catch-up.
The institutions winning in 2025 are those partnering with licensed, regulated infrastructure providers who understand both the technology and the institutional requirements: security, compliance, scalability, and seamless integration with existing systems.
The payment rails of the future are being built today. Is your institution building on them?
Disclaimer: This article is for information purposes only and should not be construed as legal, tax, investment or financial advice. Nothing contained in this article constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement or offer by Yellow Card to buy or sell any digital asset. There is risk involved in investing or transacting in digital assets, please seek professional advice if you require one. We do not assume any responsibility or liability for any loss or damage you may incur dealing with digital assets. For more information on Digital Asset Risk Disclosure please see - Risk Disclosure.
